Skip to main content

Argentina's Abortion Laws will not be Modernised


A bid to modernise Argentina’s abortion laws has been shot down by lawmakers.
The proposed bill would have permitted women to terminate their pregnancy within the first 14 weeks of conception.
But after more than 15 hours debating, Argentinian senators voted overwhelmingly against relaxing the law.
31 voted in favour of legalising abortion, and 38 voted against.
Pro-choice activists had high hopes for the bills passing. It had already been agreed by Congress, and Argentina’s president, Mauricio Macri had already agreed to sign it.
Currently, the procedure is permitted- but only in extreme cases of rape, or if there is a risk to a woman’s health. These loopholes will remain in place following yesterday’s vote.
During the debate, Senator Mario Fiad said that any loosening of the current abortion bill would mean that the right to life is becoming the ‘weakest of rights’- He called the act of abortion- ‘tragic’.
Opposition senators in the courtroom debating in favour of abortion, felt that forbidding the act only leads to illegal procedures.
Since 1983, Argentina has had to bury 3000 women, who have died of complications following illegal abortion procedures.
Despite initially disapproving of abortion, Senator Pedro Guastavino thinks that this is reason alone to legalize the procedure. ‘The only way to understand this is through the point of view of Public health.’  
Medics across the country have been staging protests, both for, and against women’s choice.
In one instance, hundreds of medics standing against abortion lay down their white coats outside the presidential palace.
This split in opinion spans the nation. The majority of residents practise Catholicism, and Argentina is the homeland of Pope Francis.
It has been thoroughly divided by the bid to loosen abortion rights for women.
Crowds of anti-abortion demonstrators celebrated outside Congress- throughout the night, after the verdict was realised.
On the flipside, pro-choice campaigners were devastated by the result. Demoralised, some activists hurled bottles post-vote.
The latest vote has reignited the abortion debate across Latin America- where strict laws on abortion are still prevalent due to the high catholic populations.
In Brazil, abortion carries with it a jail sentence of three years. Barring instances of rape, if the foetus is braindead, or if the mother is endangered by the pregnancy.
Last year, Chile approved a bill to ease the abortion ban- allowing abortion in certain circumstances, much the same as Brazil.
This loosening of legislation is considered a triumph in Chile, but illegal abortions are still rife- with complications occurring at a high rate, and a 5 year sentence in place if the women are caught.
Pockets of protesters scattered Latin America following Argentina’s failed bid- to voice support for those in Argentina that are fighting for their rights to choose. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The new Universities Minister Chris Skidmore has a dubious past

British Prime Minister Theresa May has appointed a new Universities Minister. It comes as the old one, Sam Gyimah, stepped down in protest of May’s Brexit plan, which he described as a ‘deal in name only’. Chris Skidmore will be the minister taking over the responsibility for decision making when it comes to Britain’s universities, science, research and innovation. He’s arrived to save the day! And it’s a rather mammoth amount of responsibility he’ll have- will he do a good job of it? Well, he’s only held the post for one day, so we’ve not got much to go on, apart from his voting history as the Conservative MP for Kingswood. Unfortunately, it’s not looking very good- particularly for those of whom he will be taking responsibility for- namely, the university students. In the past, Skidmore has voted against a number of rulings in the house of commons. He voted to scrap the Education maintenance Allowance, which supports students from low income families as they go into ...

X-Rated: Summa-C*M Laude

We are nearing that time of year again, when students bound up in coursework are released onto the streets in their black caps and gowns. That’s right folks, it is time for many hardworking scholars to graduate to level three, the real world. Graduation is a funny time. It’s an archaic ceremony where students are encouraged to pay through their teeth for a mortarboard and cloak, so that they can pretend to be Harry Potter when they collect their degree. Maybe there’ll be tears, most will be relieved it’s all over- and some will be lamenting their poor procrastination habits that left them both penniless and degreeless. On the other end of the spectrum, those in the top quartile of their class will receive high honors for their hard work. These honors are just as archaic as the graduation ceremony- those in the top 10% of their class will graduate with a summa cum laude. This is a latin phrase, meaning ‘with the highest honour’. But one student had their success censored,...

A Camel and a Half

A bunch of beauty contestants in Saudi Arabia have got the double-hump, after being disqualified from a beauty pageant. Why were they ejected from the competition? Well, they were accused of receiving Botox injections to make them more attractive. But what’s so weird about that? It’s curious, because the botoxed beauties were not people, per se, but camels. Saudi media reports that a veterinarian was caught synthetically altering the appearance of a caravan of camels; injecting the four legged friends with silicon, as well as surgically reducing the size of their ears. Apparently, camels with larger, more prominent features are considered more beautiful, And the most beautiful camel can win up to 57 million dollars. Clearly, a lot is at stake here. The business of camel beauty in Saudi Arabia, can be rather lucrative if the camel in question has long lips and a muscular demeanor. But as well as being in clear violation of animal rights, the alterations are against t...